Discussion:
install(1) typo
Jan Stary
2016-02-01 15:27:06 UTC
Permalink
There seems to be a "be" missing in install(1).

The whole phrase seems odd to a non-native speaker like me:
those options "should not be relied upon" because they are not portable,
not "for portability". (But I might easily be wrong.)

Jan



--- install.1.orig Mon Feb 1 13:57:31 2016
+++ install.1 Mon Feb 1 13:58:00 2016
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ The
.Fl p ,
and
.Fl S
-flags are non-standard and should not relied upon for portability.
+flags are non-standard and should not be relied upon for portability.
.Pp
Temporary files may be left in the target directory if
.Nm
Jason McIntyre
2016-02-01 15:55:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jan Stary
There seems to be a "be" missing in install(1).
those options "should not be relied upon" because they are not portable,
not "for portability". (But I might easily be wrong.)
Jan
fixed, thanks.
jmc
Post by Jan Stary
--- install.1.orig Mon Feb 1 13:57:31 2016
+++ install.1 Mon Feb 1 13:58:00 2016
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ The
.Fl p ,
and
.Fl S
-flags are non-standard and should not relied upon for portability.
+flags are non-standard and should not be relied upon for portability.
.Pp
Temporary files may be left in the target directory if
.Nm
Loading...